On Wed, 01 Dec 2010 10:46:41 -0600 Clayton Keller <[email protected]> wrote:
> Since upgrading to 0.96.5 I've seen different results with the SCAN > command.. See the discussion on clamav-devel, there are 2 bugs: the hash reply that shouldn't be there (only if you use the proto, not clamdscan), and the random loss of hash. --Edwin _______________________________________________ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
