On 06/25/2012 05:26 PM, Tom Judge wrote: > On 25/06/2012 10:10, aCaB wrote: >> FYI unrar license is incompatible with the GPL. That was the >> rationale in the packaging. > > > Yes that is why they are separate binaries. As far as we can tell > there is nothing that states that you can't put them in the same > archive file for users to install. > > No one else separates them in their packages so why should we?
I don't know about the Windows world, but plenty of people separate them on Linux: Debian has a separate libclamunrar6 package in non-free: http://packages.qa.debian.org/libc/libclamunrar.html Fedora&EPEL completely remove libclamunrar: http://pkgs.org/fedora-17/fedora-updates-x86_64/clamav-lib-0.97.5-1700.fc17.x86_64.rpm.html http://pkgs.org/centos-6-rhel-6/epel-x86_64/clamav-0.97.3-3.el6.x86_64.rpm.html Best regards, --Edwin _______________________________________________ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
