On Wednesday 17 October 2012 14:56:49 Chuck Swiger did opine: > On Oct 17, 2012, at 11:42 AM, Gene Heskett wrote: > > No, WRONG context. I am explicitly turning it off. Whether that is > > the same as removing it from the launching cli, I haven't tested. > > But I suspect that if I removed --detect-pua, it would still default > > to on. Correct? > > Nope. This is well-documented: > > clamscan(1) Clam AntiVirus > clamscan(1) > > NAME > clamscan - scan files and directories for viruses > > SYNOPSIS > clamscan [options] [file/directory/-] > > DESCRIPTION > clamscan is a command line anti-virus scanner. > > OPTIONS > Most of the options are simple switches which enable or > disable some features. Options marked with [=yes/no(*)] can be > optionally followed by =yes/=no; if they get called without the > boolean argument the scan- ner will assume 'yes'. The asterisk marks > the default internal setting for a given option. > [ ... ] > --detect-pua[=yes/no(*)] > Detect Possibly Unwanted Applications Then we have a bug. :( from the run just completed, --detect-pua=no was ignored, it still found them all. That IMO is a bug. I'll remove it for the next test run. > Regards,
Cheers, Gene -- "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author) My web page: <http://coyoteden.dyndns-free.com:85/gene> is up! We all know Linux is great... it does infinite loops in 5 seconds. - Linus Torvalds about the superiority of Linux on the Amsterdam Linux Symposium _______________________________________________ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
