Hi Steve,

On 26 mrt. 2013, at 17:54, Steven Morgan <[email protected]> wrote:

> Ben,
> 
> I am looking into this issue. In the meantime, can you get any effect from
> increasing the clamd.conf parameters ReadTimeout, CommandReadTimeout,
> SendBufTimeout, and SelfCheck?

I have doubled them and will let clamdscan run tonight. I'll report the results 
tomorrow.

Thanks,
Ben


> 
> Steve
> 
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 12:26 PM, Ben Stuyts <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> Well, still no luck, same errors over the weekend. Anybody have any other
>> ideas?
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Ben
>> 
>> On 22 mrt. 2013, at 18:43, Ben Stuyts <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> On 22 mrt. 2013, at 18:29, David Raynor <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 1:11 PM, Ben Stuyts <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>> 
>>>>> I was using clamscan for daily scanning of our user's home directories,
>>>>> but it was getting too slow with scan times of up to 6 hours. Therefor
>> I'm
>>>>> testing clamdscan and using multiple threads to scan. (cmd line is
>>>>> /usr/local/bin/clamdscan -m --fdpass /home)
>>>>> 
>>>>> I am getting the following error messages from clamd while scanning,
>> and
>>>>> it's missing a lot of files. If put the Eicar test file at various
>> spots
>>>>> and it's being missed by the scan.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thu Mar 21 22:00:01 2013 -> SelfCheck: Database status OK.
>>>>> Thu Mar 21 22:10:01 2013 -> SelfCheck: Database status OK.
>>>>> Thu Mar 21 22:13:48 2013 -> Client disconnected while scanjob was
>> active
>>>>> Thu Mar 21 22:13:48 2013 -> Client disconnected while scanjob was
>> active
>>>>> (repeat...)
>>>>> Thu Mar 21 22:14:06 2013 -> Client disconnected while scanjob was
>> active
>>>>> Thu Mar 21 22:17:29 2013 -> Reading databases from /var/db/clamav
>>>>> Thu Mar 21 22:17:36 2013 -> Database correctly reloaded (2019434
>>>>> signatures)
>>>>> 
>>>>> Output from clamdscan, no errors:
>>>>> 
>>>>> ----------- SCAN SUMMARY -----------
>>>>> Infected files: 0
>>>>> Time: 3846.032 sec (64 m 6 s)
>>>>> 
>>>>> This is on FreeBSD 7.4-stable, clamav-0.97.7 (clamav-0.97.6 had the
>> same
>>>>> problem). The home directories are all zfs based. clamd runs as user
>>>>> clamav, clamdscan as user root.
>>>>> 
>>>>> What could be causing this?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Kind regards,
>>>>> Ben
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit
>> http://wiki.clamav.net
>>>>> http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Ben,
>>>> 
>>>> The "Client disconnected while scanjob was active" lines can also show
>> up
>>>> when the scanning threads are being told to shutdown. Did freshclam run
>> and
>>>> update your signatures during this scan?
>>>> 
>>>> Dave R.
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> ---
>>>> Dave Raynor
>>>> Sourcefire Vulnerability Research Team
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit
>> http://wiki.clamav.net
>>>> http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> Yes it ran, but at the end at 22:17, not at 22:13 when the first errors
>> appeared. From freshclam.log:
>>> 
>>> --------------------------------------
>>> Received signal: wake up
>>> ClamAV update process started at Thu Mar 21 20:17:17 2013
>>> 
>>> ... and then the next entry:
>>> --------------------------------------
>>> Received signal: wake up
>>> ClamAV update process started at Thu Mar 21 22:17:23 2013
>>> main.cld is up to date (version: 54, sigs: 1044387, f-level: 60,
>> builder: sven)
>>> WARNING: getfile: daily-16881.cdiff not found on remote server (IP:
>> 217.19.16.188)
>>> WARNING: getpatch: Can't download daily-16881.cdiff from
>> database.clamav.net
>>> Downloading daily-16881.cdiff [100%]
>>> daily.cld updated (version: 16881, sigs: 980411, f-level: 63, builder:
>> guitar)
>>> bytecode.cld is up to date (version: 214, sigs: 41, f-level: 63,
>> builder: neo)
>>> Database updated (2024839 signatures) from database.clamav.net (IP:
>> 145.58.29.83)
>>> Clamd successfully notified about the update.
>>> 
>>> ... and the next:
>>> --------------------------------------
>>> Received signal: wake up
>>> ClamAV update process started at Fri Mar 22 00:17:29 2013
>>> 
>>> There were also a few incoming e-mails during that time which were
>> scanned via clamav-milter and clamd. Could that have an effect?
>>> 
>>> Ben
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
>>> http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
>>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
>> http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
> http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
> 

_______________________________________________
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://www.clamav.net/support/ml

Reply via email to