On Friday 25 March 2016 17:12:06 Groach wrote: > ClamAV signatures have never caught a dridex variant for me (and they > have been around a long time). You need to head to over to Sane > Security and start using their definitions - they have perfect > Zero-hour detections for Dridex (and other Macroware viruses). You > wont be disappointed any more. > I've tried to submit some of those too, but the sub mission page does NOT like me, so it never lets me get past square one. I have fussed once, maybe twice on this list but no msg indicates that has been fixed so I gave up.
Is it fixed to accept new stuff now? > On 25/03/2016 22:06, C.D. Cochrane wrote: > > Hi, > > I receive a Locky-ransomware variant almost every day as an email > > attachment. So far ClamAV has failed to detect it. Each file has > > had a unique signature. Does ClamAV have a detection plan and/or > > work in progress that will start to detect future variants of this? > > thanks, > > Chris > > _______________________________________________ > > Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: > > https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq > > > > http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml > > _______________________________________________ > Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: > https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq > > http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml Cheers, Gene Heskett -- "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author) Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene> _______________________________________________ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml
