On 03/26/2016 02:26 PM, C.D. Cochrane wrote:
> And I am guessing my Linux distro will not just seamlessly move on to 0.99 by
> itself with an "apt-get update".
>
If you are using Debian, you will get quite quick upgrades by adding
jessie/updates resp. wheezy/updates to
your sources.list.
Regards
Racke
>
>
> Sent: Friday, March 25, 2016 at 11:00 PM
> From: "Joel Esler (jesler)" <[email protected]>
> To: "ClamAV users ML" <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [clamav-users] Locky Dridex plan
> Generally this means that we just won't regression test signatures against
> that version anymore.
>
> --
> Joel Esler
> Manager, Talos Group
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On Mar 25, 2016, at 10:12 PM, Al Varnell
> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
> Can you be a little more specific about the manner in which this will take
> place? Does it just mean no support or do you plan to poison pill the
> database so the engine will no longer function, as has happened in the past.
>
> Sent from Janet's iPad
>
> -Al-
>
> On Mar 25, 2016, at 6:24 PM, "Joel Esler (jesler)" wrote:
> One step needs to be to EOL 0.97.x releases (as we should have done when we
> released 0.99, as per our EOL plan). As those older versions don't accept
> certain types of signatures.
> _______________________________________________
> Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
> https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq
>
> http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml
> _______________________________________________
> Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
> https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq[https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq]
>
> http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml
> _______________________________________________
> Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
> https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq
>
> http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml
>
--
Perl and Dancer Development
_______________________________________________
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq
http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml
