Am 19.07.2016 um 19:19 schrieb Charles Swiger:
On Jul 19, 2016, at 1:09 PM, Reindl Harald <[email protected]> wrote:
False.  Assuming that there is only one correct mail architecture is a major 
fallacy.

bla - yes there are more ways but your whole stuff about SPF was entirely wrong 
from the very begin in case of the messages in question

You managed to misinterpet what I actually said, and are now off in the weeds.

Have fun with that strawman.

you just said nothing but nonsense in context of that messages and trigger a "heuristic phising" in case of a paypal mail from a mailserver listed in the SPF of the paypal spf belonging to the envelope sender is a false postive

not be able to whitelist such a misbehaving trigger without disable other things too is a bug and/or design mistake - period

If a mail server sends outbound, it needs to be willing to handle bounces and 
DSNs for those  messages/domains which it sends.

bullshit - the MX does and this servers outbound mail was *not* for a domain 
below it's own hostname and so it has no business for inbound mail

That, and you are inexcusably rude to people who were trying to help you.

trying to help?
where?

well, agreed, more useful than the first response "You must disable Heuristics using clamd.conf " while such a otpion don't exist

you are talking 90% of this thread completly off-topic stuff

Good day, sir.  I hope your customers find better service elsewhere

i doubt - the problem itself is solved for days but in a way which should not be needed and the whole conversation with you was to 90% or more completly off-topic

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq

http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml

Reply via email to