Am 02.02.2017 um 14:31 schrieb Groach:
the much better question is *why* is clamav that much memory wasting >
especially 385 MB for the official rules which barely hit anything and >
are removed here entirely from production machines for some weeks after
hit nothing over the last 3 months - any catches was done by >
sanesecurity alone > > that whole thing don't scale at all compared to
any other AV solution > which runs fine on a win7 virtual machine with a
total of 2 GB RAM
Quite.
(Ssshhhh.... Joel doesnt like you saying bad things about their
signatures! :-/ )
Anyway.... still looking for answers to why the comparison in the
original example is so high
it's not about their signatures alone - it's about clamav at all because
also the memory usage of 3rd party signatures is higher than any other
malware scanner on this planet
that maybe would fine if clamav would have the best hitrate, but by far
it don't
_______________________________________________
clamav-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq
http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml
