Oh.. ok..But how Commercial AV Calculating risk level of malware and what is the criteria for that.?
On 14 April 2017 at 22:00, Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net> wrote: > > > Am 14.04.2017 um 18:28 schrieb crazy thinker: > >> All Commericial AV's showign risk status of malware >> >> SanSecurity creating signature database files based and it showing risk >> status of malware >> > > sanesecurity shows *risk of false-positives* > don't confuse such basics > > > On 14 April 2017 at 21:17, SCOTT PACKARD <scott.pack...@raytheon.com> >> wrote: >> >> >>> No. all malware would not be large risk.. for an example, EICAR test >>>> >>> file >>> >>>> is sample virus file.it can't make big damage to system. >>>> >>> >>> Can you present another example, other than the EICAR test file? >>> _______________________________________________ >>> clamav-users mailing list >>> clamav-users@lists.clamav.net >>> http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users >>> >>> >>> Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: >>> https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq >>> >>> http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml >>> >> _______________________________________________ > clamav-users mailing list > clamav-users@lists.clamav.net > http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users > > > Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: > https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq > > http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml > _______________________________________________ clamav-users mailing list clamav-users@lists.clamav.net http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml
