Am 04.05.2017 um 13:39 schrieb crazy thinker:
Please find below ClamAV performance statistics
In our recent *ClamAV Detection rate test*….
Sanesecurity signatures : *97.11%*
SecuriteInfo signatures (free) : 19.03%
ClamAV Official only signatures: 13.82%
Number of signatures:
Sanesecurity signatures : *249,766*
SecuriteInfo (free) : 1,110,596
ClamAV Only : 4,137,929
Date of oldest malware Sample in test : 06.01.2015
Date of newest malware Sample in test: 05.12.2015
Optimized Database means the db having leass no of signatures and can able
to give more malware detection rate
that logic by itslef is nonsense - how would less signatures give better
rates?
but yes, on a mailsevrer the official signatures are completly useless
and hence we don't push them for many months from the machine running
freshcalm to the inbound mailserver
why?
beause analyze 6 months logs gave only 3 hits on the offical at all and
even for them it's unknown if it would not have been caught by the
unnoficila anyways and because it's unacceptable having a clamd process
which wastes nearly 1 GB of RAM hanging around when he don't catch anything
_______________________________________________
clamav-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq
http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml
