On Tuesday 17 July 2018, Al Varnell wrote: > It's best to use the bytecode interpreter for ClamAV > bytecode signatures, but if for some reason you feel > you must use LLVM-JIT
I thought it was necessary to use llvm to use bytecode signatures. Was I wrong? Is ClamAV not lost functionality without LLVM? -- Regards, Sergey _______________________________________________ clamav-users mailing list clamav-users@lists.clamav.net http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml
