Just as a reminder, so no one is getting frustrated by the CentOS (or other distro) package maintainers: We (ClamAV team) made a mistake in the ClamAV 0.101.0 header files impacting projects downstream that rely on our library. I just re-posted the details from our previous disclosure in a new blog entry, to reach a wider audience since a lot of folks probably didn't see the mailing list annoucement: https://blog.clamav.net/2018/12/libclamav-missing-headers-issue.html
Because of the header file issue, package maintainers have been holding off until we get a patch release out. Sorry for the inconvenience! Micah Micah Snyder ClamAV Development Talos Cisco Systems, Inc. On Dec 21, 2018, at 9:12 AM, Benny Pedersen <m...@junc.eu<mailto:m...@junc.eu>> wrote: Claudiu Albu skrev den 2018-12-21 13:56: CLAMAV VERSION is: "_WARNING: Local version: 0.100.2 Recommended version: 0.101.0_" After some reading, this seems to be the latest version in a stable CentOS EPEL stable repo - correct? no freshclam reports latest stable version, its upto centos maintainrs to put that version into there repo, 2 options now is, wait, build rpms localy self, and install that rpm update http://lifeofageekadmin.com/build-rpms-centos/ why wait ? :=) _______________________________________________ clamav-users mailing list clamav-users@lists.clamav.net http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml
_______________________________________________ clamav-users mailing list clamav-users@lists.clamav.net http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml
