I think that Shadowservers statistics are drastically wrong and haven’t changed in about 5 years. That’s number one.
Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 15, 2019, at 04:26, 조정환 <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello everyone ~ > > I looked around the other site bulletin board for .clamav, and I had a > question, so I got a question here. > > If you are using clamav as a user and you are viewing an internet evaluation > article, > > 'clamAV has a lot of error detection.' , 'The detection rate is lower than > other products', and > > 'malicious code detection rate' based on 'https://www.shadowserver.org/' It > is not good because it is only 23.46% (as of 2018). > I am wondering what you think about clamAV's malware error detection rate and > accurate detection rate. > Another is, if so, what are the criteria or rationale? > And finally, if the error detection rate is high and the detection rate is > low, I wonder what method to use to increase this. > > > > > > > > > 수소차, 폭발하면 > 어떡하죠? > > 당신의 ‘제2의 인생’ 설계를 > 도와드립니다 > > [‘한국관광 100선’ 따라 떠나는 국내여행] ⑥ 강원권 > > 하숙집·원룸 > 부실공사 막는다 > > 조용히 찾아와 실명까지 > 일으키는 ‘녹내장’ > > _______________________________________________ > clamav-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users > > > Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: > https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq > > http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ clamav-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml
