On 12.12.19 22:15, Joel Esler (jesler) via clamav-users wrote:
They are served over https. But only 102.x supports https. So as soon as
everyone moves to https, I’ll gladly decommission http.
HTTP is easily cacheable, people may like that.
On Dec 12, 2019, at 15:01, Nick Howitt <[email protected]> wrote:
But If you are behind another virus scanner, it can't so easily be intercepted
and trip up the scanner.
On 12/12/2019 19:56, Al Varnell via clamav-users wrote:
Each DB's integrity is protected by an embedded signature, so https adds little
or nothing to security here.
-Al-
On Dec 12, 2019, at 11:45, kaifeng zeng via clamav-users <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi,
One of the recommended way to get the latest Virus definition DB is through the
following link. Why they are not https? Thanks!
http://database.clamav.net/main.cvd
http://database.clamav.net/daily.cvd
http://database.clamav.net/bytecode.cvd
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, [email protected] ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
There's a long-standing bug relating to the x86 architecture that
allows you to install Windows. -- Matthew D. Fuller
_______________________________________________
clamav-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.clamav.net/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq
http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml
