Agreed. You need to upgrade the engine. Sent from my iPad
> On Feb 26, 2020, at 10:12, Arjen de Korte via clamav-users > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Citeren 99r c via clamav-users <[email protected]>: > >> I am in a situation (just started working here last month) where I have an >> install of a few RHEL 5.5 machines that are an embedded (and on a non >> internet connected network) and are scheduled for replacement, the clamav on >> these machines >> is 0.99.2 and the current definitions fail so my question is: >> >> what would be the last definition date that would work with this clamav >> 0.99.2 > > None at all. You shouldn't be running a four year old virus scanner with > known security problems: > > https://www.cvedetails.com/vulnerability-list/vendor_id-8871/product_id-15657/version_id-218257/Clamav-Clamav-0.99.2.html > > You can't trust whatever you throwing at the virus scanner not to abuse any > of these issues. If you really need to keep these systems up, unplug them > from the network and remove all possibilities to read removable media (you > don't need a virus scanner anymore in that case). > > > _______________________________________________ > > clamav-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.clamav.net/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users > > > Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: > https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq > > http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ clamav-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.clamav.net/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml
