Citeren Matus UHLAR - fantomas <[email protected]>:
On 13.03.21 14:39, Arjen de Korte via clamav-users wrote:
Which would be the decent way too. If QNAP/Synology is monetizing
on a product that is provided to them free of charge, the least
they could do is to take the burden of the updates of the
signatures by providing a mirror.
those devices are not supported by QNAP.
I'm well aware of that, this was apparently less clear than I
intended. Of course QNAP should only provide a mirror for their own
customers, likewise Synology should provide one for their customers.
QNAP does not provide functional nor security updates for them, and newer
ClamAV versions seem to be considered functional updates by QNAP.
Thus I really dobt QNAP would provide freshclam mirror.
QNAP still bundles/supports ClamAV on their recent models, so the
decency of providing a mirror for their customers still stands. If
only to make sure that if the updates go haywire because of a
configuration error on QNAPs part which is pretty much impossible to
fix for an ordinary user, they will suffer the burden.
_______________________________________________
clamav-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.clamav.net/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq
http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml
