On 1/26/2009 4:38 PM, rkml wrote: > ClamAV was designed for the Server Market and since most servers are *nix > based, this is the reason why. For Windows Desktop there are other > solutions that are better than ClamAV like Avast, AVG, for the general user > (sorry but it is true). If you are running a Windows Server though, the > only option that is worth trying without spending a lot of dough is ClamAV > for Win32. > Some smaller AV companies include the ability to run on a server when you license their network version. This seriously reduces the cost of running AV on a server, though I'd argue that AVG isn't so stable for command-line use in a mail server. That is, I tried it and it crashes. ClamAV has been fairly stable and reliable though I've had to switch builds at times due to instability or performance issues.
Didn't know about the --install parameter... that's cool and I may decide to abandon my project in favor of that if it works. Thanks, Bret _______________________________________________ http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-win32
