This is a question about size and shape in morphometric studies.

I have a series of measurements of bone lengths in individuals that vary 
greatly in size. I want to consider similarities and differences between the 
individuals solely in terms of shape. To remove differences in absolute size I 
have taken each individual, summed all the measurements for that individual, 
and then divided each measurement by that sum.

This is an intuitively simple method. Some years ago I read a recommendation 
about using it. Now an editor is asking me to cite a reference to the use of 
the method. Unfortunately I cannot recollect where I saw it advocated.

Can anybody help?

I know that there are various alternative methods for eliminating size in 
multivariate morphometric work, such as eliminating the first principal 
component if that is one of general size. However my question is not about the 
competing merits of size/shape methodologies in general. This is a specific 
request for a citation of the approach outlined above. 
 

Reply via email to