> Furthermore, it is non-sensical that you are violating a
> copyright by implementing the ideas expressed by a
> copyrighted specification.  Copyright is the protection of
> "expression of ideas", not the ideas themselves.
> Copyright protects the particular expression, not the ideas
> themselves.

Well said Dick.  Who in their right mind can claim to own something as
ephemeral as an idea?
-- 

Daniel Rall ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

Reply via email to