Paul Fisher wrote:
> /* As a special exception, if you link this library with other files
> to produce an executable, this library does not by itself cause
> the resulting executable to be covered by the GNU General Public
> License. This exception does not however invalidate any other
> reasons why the executable file might be covered by the GNU
> General Public License. */
Just to satisfy my curiosity: how does this differ from the LGPL,
and why was this solution preferred to using LGPL?
b.
--
"Problem solving is hunting. It is savage pleasure,
and we are born to it." Thomas Harris, Silence of the Lambs
- Announcement: libgcj and GNU Classpath merge Paul Fisher
- Re: Announcement: libgcj and GNU Classpath merge Bernd Kreimeier
- Re: Announcement: libgcj and GNU Classpath merge Stuart Ballard
- Re: Announcement: libgcj and GNU Classpath merge Mark Benvenuto
- Re: Announcement: libgcj and GNU Classpath merge Jochen Hoenicke
- Re: Announcement: libgcj and GNU Classpath merge Stuart Ballard
- Re: Announcement: libgcj and GNU Classpath merge Artur Biesiadowski
- Re: Announcement: libgcj and GNU Classpath merge Tom Tromey
- Re: Announcement: libgcj and GNU Classpath merge Bernd Kreimeier
- Re: Announcement: libgcj and GNU Classpath mer... Aaron M. Renn
- Re: Announcement: libgcj and GNU Classpath merge Tom Tromey

