Artur Biesiadowski ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > Both code bases take roughly the same approach. Only details differ.
> > My recommendation is to take the libgcj framework, and then heavily
> > modify it to incorporate the good points from Classpath:
>
> At some point in past Classpath converters were broken - they was using
> static variable in superclass in way presuming it will be different for
> each subclass. This allowed to have only one converter active at same
> moment (last one to initialize was overshadowing all others). I'm not
> sure if it was corrected - if yes, then disregard this post, if not,
> watch out for this, because it is very easy to thing to overlook when
> checking.
That was a great catch and yes, I believe the Classpath converters are
still broken in this regard.
--
Aaron M. Renn ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.urbanophile.com/arenn/
