On Thu, 2005-04-14 at 18:50 +0200, Michael Koch wrote: > On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 06:28:53PM +0100, Andrew John Hughes wrote: > > > Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but I think the amendment should be to > > list both years, not to throw away the first (i.e. 2002,2005 rather than > > 2005) > > Generally right but wrong in this case because these files were written > this year and dont existed in 2002. > > > Michael
I guess that serves me right for replying too quickly; I didn't spot that these were new. -- Andrew :-) Please avoid sending me Microsoft Office (e.g. Word, PowerPoint) attachments. See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html No software patents in Europe -- http://nosoftwarepatents.com "Value your freedom, or you will lose it, teaches history. `Don't bother us with politics' respond those who don't want to learn." -- Richard Stallman Escape the Java Trap with GNU Classpath! http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html public class gcj extends Freedom implements Java { ... }
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Classpath-patches mailing list Classpath-patches@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath-patches
