On Tue, 2005-07-05 at 11:22 -0400, Thomas Fitzsimmons wrote: > Should I be building with --enable-Werror? I plan to commit another > patch today that will eliminate these warnings and I thought it was > acceptable to introduce temporary warnings. If not, --enable-Werror > should be the default.
Yeah, I always build with --enable-Werror. I didn't make this the default since we are not warning free on all platforms. For example on cygwin there are always warnings because of issues with the system headers. It would probably be a good idea to default to --enable-Werror for CVS, but to --disable-Werror for releases. But I am afraid I would forget to change the default and cause trouble for people that don't compile much, but are on exotic platforms. Cheers, Mark
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Classpath-patches mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath-patches
