Hi, On Fri, 2005-07-15 at 10:08 -0600, Tom Tromey wrote: > >>>>> "Mark" == Mark Wielaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Mark> The icons weren't actually included in the distribution since our > Mark> dist-hook removes everything from standard.omit at the last moment. > > Why would we do that in dist-hook? > > Also, why are the icons in the source directories and not somewhere > under resource/? Or to put it another way, why do we have resource > as a separate directory?
Both are historic. The gtk plaf was written by Brian before we had a real working swing.plaf implementation. It partly didn't compile so we put it in standard.omit. If it compiles now and actually works we should remove the whole line from standard.omit. I believe removing anything from standard.omit in the dist-hook is just wrong. And I will remove that part. Since the build scripts will take care of it anyway, so there is no harm in distributing. It is probably also better to have all resources under resource/ to make the build easier. I haven't investigated that yet though. Cheers, Mark
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Classpath-patches mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath-patches
