>>>>> "Mark" == Mark Wielaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> You compile all of these. >> Then you go back and add 'private ... readResolve()' to B. Mark> How precisely would you go back? Yeah, ignore that example. I was thinking about binary compatibility, but that is too complicated. >> Should C now really be using A's readResolve()? Mark> No, it should use B's readResolve(). Doesn't it seem weird to use a method that is not inherited? It does to me. But, I don't know what is correct in this situation -- I'm just asking. Tom _______________________________________________ Classpath-patches mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath-patches
