Hi Guilhem, On Wed, 2005-08-03 at 15:10 +0200, Guilhem Lavaux wrote: > Here is the patch to rename > > 2005-08-03 Guilhem Lavaux < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > * gnu/classpath/Pointer.java, > gnu/classpath/Pointer32.java, > gnu/classpath/Pointer64.java, > gnu/classpath/RawData.java, > gnu/classpath/RawData32.java, > gnu/classpath/RawData64.java, > gnu/java/awt/peer/gtk/GtkImage.java, > gnu/java/nio/charset/iconv/IconvDecoder.java, > gnu/java/nio/charset/iconv/IconvEncoder.java, > java/nio/Buffer.java, > java/nio/DirectByteBufferImpl.java, > java/nio/MappedByteBufferImpl.java, > native/jni/classpath/jcl.c, > native/jni/gtk-peer/gnu_java_awt_peer_gtk_GtkImage.c, > native/jni/java-nio/gnu_java_nio_channels_FileChannelImpl.c, > native/jni/java-nio/gnu_java_nio_charset_iconv_IconvDecoder.c, > native/jni/java-nio/gnu_java_nio_charset_iconv_IconvEncoder.c, > native/jni/java-nio/java_nio_MappedByteBufferImpl.c, > native/jni/java-nio/java_nio_VMDirectByteBuffer.c, > vm/reference/java/nio/VMDirectByteBuffer.java: Renamed > references to gnu/classpath/RawData to gnu/classpath/Pointer.
Since this changes the runtime VM interface (which exposes the RawData/Pointer class in a couple of method signatures) you need to document this at least in the NEWS file. And for bonus points in the doc/integration.texi file. Thanks, Mark
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Classpath-patches mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath-patches
