>>>>> "Norman" == Norman Hendrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Norman> 1) Is there any deep reason why the AC_PROG_CXX test is commented out?
Norman> 2a) If not, could somebody with write access please reinstate it?
I'm checking in the appended.
I don't think this should hurt, and I couldn't think of a reason it
ought to be disabled.
Tom
Index: ChangeLog
from Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* configure.ac: Call AC_PROG_CXX.
Index: configure.ac
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/classpath/classpath/configure.ac,v
retrieving revision 1.103
diff -u -r1.103 configure.ac
--- configure.ac 24 Aug 2005 22:38:46 -0000 1.103
+++ configure.ac 25 Aug 2005 13:49:42 -0000
@@ -169,7 +169,7 @@
dnl -----------------------------------------------------------
dnl Checks for programs.
dnl -----------------------------------------------------------
-dnl AC_PROG_CXX
+AC_PROG_CXX
dnl Initialize libtool
AC_DISABLE_STATIC
AC_PROG_LIBTOOL
_______________________________________________
Classpath-patches mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath-patches
