Hi, [I CC'ed [EMAIL PROTECTED] since that mainly concerns GCJ]
Am Mittwoch, den 07.09.2005, 07:44 -0400 schrieb Thomas Fitzsimmons: > On Tue, 2005-09-06 at 22:41 +0200, Roman Kennke wrote: > > I re-enabled some accessibility things in javax.swing that have been > > disabled due to a compiler bug in gcj < 4. I think now that the 0.18 > > release is out it would be a good time to get rid of this > > gcj<4-bug-support things. This will also remove a lot of clutter in the > > JAPI pages and maybe brings some points in the score :-) > > This still breaks with gcj HEAD: > > /home/fitzsim/sources/gcc/libjava/classpath/javax/swing/Box.java:67: > error: Nested class java.awt.Container$AccessibleAWTContainer is > protected; cannot be accessed from here. > protected class AccessibleBox extends Container.AccessibleAWTContainer > ^ > /home/fitzsim/sources/gcc/libjava/classpath/javax/swing/Box.java:92: > error: Nested class java.awt.Component$AccessibleAWTComponent is > protected; cannot be accessed from here. > extends Component.AccessibleAWTComponent > > I assume this is a known GCC bug? I double checked this. It definitly does compile with the gcj-4.0 that ships with ubuntu (a pre-something release, but anyway. I assume there have been no regressions between 4.0-preX and 4.0-final). So this looks like a regression in gcj4.1/HEAD. /Roman
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Classpath-patches mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath-patches
