(forgot to cc the list again) On 10/5/05, Mark Wielaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think the "right thing to do" here is just ignoring this field.
I disagree, but you're the maintainer so I guess you get the final word. > A constantly changing constant static field value is useless anyway. Yes, but it's also harmless. And it's my opinion that false positives in the error report *are* harmful in a small way. If I can't convince you to check in the patch then I'll try to think of a way to get japitools to ignore these. I'd rather not, though. > And > adding RCS keywords in our own source code only makes the problem worse > since people have to be careful that they don't get expanded when moving > the source around between repositories. I carefully wrote the patch so that this wouldn't be an issue. RCSID = "$" + "Id: ... Stuart. -- http://sab39.dev.netreach.com/ -- http://sab39.dev.netreach.com/ _______________________________________________ Classpath-patches mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath-patches
