Robert Schuster wrote: > However I consider these tests wrong because they violate the > URL spec.
Some people (like me) believe it is more important, in some cases, to be compatible with the reference implementation than to the spec. > proto:////p1/p2 > > is not the same as > > proto://p1/p2 > > Furthermore this is exactly the bug which causes trouble in > our XML parser and since the other implementation contains it > too I send Sun a problem report. > > I am going to fix these tests afterwards. Obviously they will > then fail on Sun-based VMs until they fix the problem, too. It's highly unlikely Sun will fix their code, see also: http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=4737160 http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=4110155 http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=4447088 http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=5014591 http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=5018803 Regards, Jeroen _______________________________________________ Classpath-patches mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath-patches
