On Tue, 2005-11-01 at 22:16 +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote: > That seems like an significant improvement. Could you test with a larger > dataset (or just run the test in a loop 10 times)? I still haven't tried > with gcj. If someone could test, that would be super. I believe gcj has > really slow monitor enter and exit support so the speedup should be > significant there. But without testing...
In a 10 times loop (fastest of 3 runs): w/o: 13.92user w/: 10.14user Interestingly i get 11 more minor page faults: w/o: 0inputs+0outputs (0major+2477minor)pagefaults 0swaps w/: 0inputs+0outputs (0major+2488minor)pagefaults 0swaps But who cares, it's faster. :-) TWISTI _______________________________________________ Classpath-patches mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath-patches
