Am Dienstag, den 08.11.2005, 10:46 -0500 schrieb Anthony Balkissoon: > On Tue, 2005-11-08 at 11:53 +0000, Roman Kennke wrote: > > Hi again, > > > > Yesterday I checked in a change to java.awt.Component. Today I wrote a > > testcase for that (bad me, I should really do that before starting to > > code) that shows that this fix was wrong. I revert that. > > Hi all, can we please mention which test cases (if they are Mauve tests) > we're referring to in our messages to classpath-patches?
Good idea. Although I try to make this easy. I always write testcases that mirror the method name of the tested method in the classname and the classname of the tested class in the package name. So when I want to test java.awt.Component.invalidate() I write a test with the class name gnu.testlet.java.awt.Component.invalidate. /Roman
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
_______________________________________________ Classpath-patches mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath-patches
