Hi Roman, On Mon, 2005-11-21 at 22:23 +0100, Roman Kennke wrote: > Looks ok. Except that the cache is possibly invalidated a little too > often. I would think that the focus state doesn't change the > minimumSize. Also, the general propertyChange() invalidation is maybe > not good. But still ok to check in.
Yeah, you are right it isn't that likely to trigger a size change. But we didn't do any caching before. And custom look and feels seem to do lots of interesting tweaks. So I like to be a bit paranoid here. Checking this in as is now. If someone feels they can optimize it and that is worth it then please do. Cheers, Mark
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Classpath-patches mailing list Classpath-patches@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath-patches
