>>>>> "Jan" == Jan Röhrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jan> oh, I didn't know that these method invocations are faster. But I prefer Jan> a more generalized code style. Ok it's a private field so this may be no Jan> problem in this case. Jan> But are there any other opinions on that or is this somewhere defined in Jan> a GNU/Classpath Code style? AFAIK it isn't a defined style. I have a slight preference for the more specific declaration. For private fields (and local variables) this doesn't hurt clarity or maintainability, particularly if you do future refactorings with a tool like eclipse. And, it provides a small performance benefit. Tom _______________________________________________ Classpath-patches mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath-patches
