Hi Jeff, On Mon, 2005-12-26 at 19:24 -0500, Jeff Bailey wrote: > There are still several FIXMEs in the code, but I don't think any of > them are barriers to adding the class to CVS. Most of them are details > that will be sorted out as the rest of the implementation is done and > it's possible to actually test the code.
Thanks. Tom had two change requests. The only thing I would like to add is that it is better to explicitly use getName() in both hashCode() and equals(). equals() now uses toString(), which directly call getName(), but that could get changed (as the FIXME suggests) in the future. BTW. In general the toString() method should only be used for quick human readable output (for debugging purposes) so the exact String returned doesn't matter that much. Cheers, Mark
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Classpath-patches mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath-patches
