On Sun, 2006-01-01 at 23:42 +0100, Andreas Tobler wrote: > Well, he hasn't yet, but I'll add my comment here. > > I'd like to see it as an unsigned int and not an int. Most systems I > know use unsigned int for socklen_t. Posix.1g also recommends to use > uint32_t for socklen_t.
Well, on this very special OS not even uint32_t is defined. So i'd vote for `unsigned int' if you think we should use unsigned. TWISTI _______________________________________________ Classpath-patches mailing list Classpath-patches@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath-patches
