Tom Tromey wrote: >>>>>>"Dalibor" == Dalibor Topic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >>>`(1 << k) < 128' failed. > > > mprec overflow... > > >>>#0 0x00002aaaab028df0 in raise () from /lib/libc.so.6 > > > ... 64 bit machine ... > > Dalibor> JvAssert only kicked in if DEBUG was defined, which assert always > Dalibor> kicks in unless NDEBUG is defined. Other than that, they do the same > Dalibor> checks, so it may be a real bug in mprec.c. Could you investigate on > Dalibor> your arch/os? > > The buffer size workaround I applied to mprec isn't completely safe -- > it just works in more cases. This is why we need the newer > dynamically-allocating mprec. >
Could you elaborate some more? I am not very familar with mprec's bugs, yet. :) cheers, dalibor topic _______________________________________________ Classpath-patches mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath-patches
