Hi, On Fri, 2006-02-10 at 14:20 -0700, Tom Tromey wrote: > IMO the current patch is fine. It isn't unclear. And, bizarrely, > we'll have plenty of email threads to refer people to on the off > chance that somebody doesn't understand it. ;-)
Hehe. This must be the most discussed patch ever. And that for a simple two-liner patch! I still think this is a bit silly. And we shouldn't really have these fields. But it seems I am outvoted, and if we do have these fields it does no harm to have the same values in them. And I have noticed that Stuart actually has much more seniority then I have. He has been a GNU Classpath hacker since 1998 (years before I even joined the project!) So I finally just checked it in. Cheers, Mark
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
