Hi Robert, Am Montag, den 20.02.2006, 02:33 +0100 schrieb Robert Schuster: > Hi, > although this patch is ridicously simple I ask for what others think about > it. I > too pen & paper to simulate what should happen in shiftGapEndUp and came to > the > conclusion that there is no reason why the mark should be set to newGapEnd + 1 > and that the correct new mark would have been newGapEnd.
This looks fine, please commit. /Roman
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
