Hi Jeroen, On Sun, 2006-04-23 at 12:27 +0200, Jeroen Frijters wrote: > Oops. Wrong commit order. I've committed my other change as well, so we > should be OK now.
Cool. Just updated again and things seems fine. Thanks. I believe that with your and Andrew's work we are now synced for the VM Classes between generics and trunk. There is one change to Class.newInstance() from you that never went in. I didn't see any objections to it, but also no strong support for it. Do you still need that one? http://developer.classpath.org/pipermail/classpath/2006-March/000728.html It would be a good point to declare the vm classes interface frozen for now and work towards a new snapshot release that includes them. It has been almost 2 months since 0.90 and there have been a lot of other improvements since then. And it would be good to get a release out before we start merging in the new tools util and applet plugin classes. Unfortunately I am going on vacation in about an hour and then attend LinuxTag the week after so I won't be able to coordinate it. But if someone else would and could see if the vm interface is doable for other runtimes (I believe it works with jamvm and cacao already with only minor patches that add some noops for now) that would be appreciated. Cheers, Mark
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
