On Wed, 2006-06-07 at 17:35 +0200, Roman Kennke wrote: > Hi there, > > I'd like to propose to rename the gnu.regexp package to > gnu.java.util.regex or something. I have a problem here with JEdit which > obviously uses an old version of gnu regexp and no hit some > AbstractMethodError with this setup. I think it could avoid problems > with other apps too. I tried this with JEdit (such refactoring takes > some seconds only in eclipse) and got nice syntax highlighting to work > in JEdit: > > http://kennke.org/~roman/jedit2.png > > Opinions? > > /Roman >
Sounds good to me; it would match our assumed naming schema better (AFAIK we don't use a pure GNU regex anyway, but one with lots of our own patches) and if that sorts out the JEdit problem I saw earlier this week, so much the better. Cheers, -- Andrew :-) Please avoid sending me Microsoft Office (e.g. Word, PowerPoint) attachments. See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html If you use Microsoft Office, support movement towards the end of vendor lock-in: http://opendocumentfellowship.org/petition/ "Value your freedom, or you will lose it, teaches history. `Don't bother us with politics' respond those who don't want to learn." -- Richard Stallman Escape the Java Trap with GNU Classpath! http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html public class gcj extends Freedom implements Java { ... }
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
