>>>>> "Keith" == Keith Seitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Keith> Ah, that looks like a better approach than what I did. I incorrectly Keith> assumed gtk-peers was needed. Not peers, just gtk. Keith> Can someone look at Paul's patch in 27923: It is really quite Keith> small... Or suggest something better? This is a really big annoyance. I took a quick look at the patch. It seems to me that we could end up checking for gtk+-2.0 in two different ways... that doesn't seem too good. I think a little refactoring would be better. We could hoist the code to check for gtk so that it is done when needed by either the peers or appletviewer, and then use the result of that for the subsequent checks. Alternatively... I don't think your original patch was too bad, but then, I don't think the situation where the user wants to build the applet viewer but not the gtk peers is one that is really worth much effort on our part. Tom
