Mark Wielaard wrote: >> I've been hacking on our NIO stuff a bit, and I will need to modify our >> java.net code, too. I'd like to do those modifications after this goes in. >> >> In general I'll say that the approach looks pretty good. I'd prefer that >> we stick closer to a POSIX API, and make the cp* functions just simple >> wrappers where they need to be (as in: blocking syscalls). I don't have >> a Linux machine to test this on right now, though. >> >> It is probably OK to commit this now, then fix the issues on darwin (et >> al) in CVS. > > Since this finally cleans up the target layer stuff I would like this to > go in now and then we build on this for your further improvements to NIO > and the socket timeouts. OK? >
OK. Since I'm working off of cvs head I'm probably queering up the diffs and history; is there any issue with me overwiting some of these changes, not necessarily building off of them? Since this cleans up stuff beyond javanet, I'd like to see it committed.
