On Mon, 2008-04-21 at 14:34 +0000, Andrew John Hughes wrote: > Indeed you did suggest it, but didn't give me a good reason to do it... ;)
True :-) > > Anyway, here's the patch to change to an int. I haven't changed the other > two, because it also means introducing a cast in the loop body. If it's > still worthwhile, given this, I'll add that too. I think it doesn't matter, performance wise, anyways. It's a static class initializer, running only once. An int would just be more obvious. Btw, the fix works. Thanks for commiting it. - twisti
