Hi Andrew, On Thu, 2008-11-06 at 11:47 +0000, Andrew Haley wrote: > Andrew Haley wrote: > > Mark Wielaard wrote: > >> cc1: warnings being treated as errors > > > > Ah, right. We should do that in the gcj build too. > > I've just noticed something. My patch uses a declaration (of pelements) > after some statements, and this is not legal C90, although most > compilers support it. (OK, I confess, I forgot this was C and not > C++ :-) > > Do we care? -Wdeclaration-after-statement will warn for this.
Probably not for the gtk+ peers. We do have -pedantic in STRICT_WARNING_CFLAGS for most C code. But gtk+ headers themselves aren't pedantic clean... Cheers, Mark
