On 12 October 2011 03:52, Mark Wielaard <m...@klomp.org> wrote: > On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 10:29 +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 1:28 AM, Dr Andrew John Hughes >> <ahug...@redhat.com> wrote: >> > If we're going to change that, it should happen after the next release >> > and with plenty of discussion / heads up for VMs. >> >> Right. I guess I could send patches for JamVM, CACAO, and Jato as >> well. Are there other VMs we care about? > > JikesRVM and GCJ of course! > Although they only use part of the VM interface at this time. > There is a somewhat full list at: > https://www.gnu.org/software/classpath/stories.html#jvm > Some of those are somewhat in "hibernation" though. > Heay, and JATO is missing... > > And if we are going to extend/adapt the VM interface anyway, it would > not harm to work on the Common Virtual Machine Interface (CVMI) project > http://icedtea.classpath.org/wiki/CVMIDiscussion > (Heay, I can dream :) > > Cheers, > > Mark
Jikes RVM is woefully out-of-date wrt Classpath, MRP (http://mrp.codehaus.org/) isn't :-) Regards, Ian
