----- Original Message -----
> Signed-off-by: Pekka Enberg <penb...@kernel.org>
> ---
> java/net/ServerSocket.java | 8 ++++++++
> java/net/Socket.java | 8 ++++++++
> java/net/SocketImpl.java | 8 ++++++++
> 3 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/java/net/ServerSocket.java b/java/net/ServerSocket.java
> index 1dbd763..453fb29 100644
> --- a/java/net/ServerSocket.java
> +++ b/java/net/ServerSocket.java
> @@ -584,6 +584,14 @@ public class ServerSocket
> }
>
> /**
> + * @since 1.5
> + */
> + public void setPerformancePreferences(int connectionTime, int
> latency, int bandwidth)
> + {
> + // Ignored
> + }
> +
> + /**
> * Returns the value of this socket as a <code>String</code>.
> *
> * @return This socket represented as a <code>String</code>.
> diff --git a/java/net/Socket.java b/java/net/Socket.java
> index 32b12e8..26490e3 100644
> --- a/java/net/Socket.java
> +++ b/java/net/Socket.java
> @@ -1294,4 +1294,12 @@ public class Socket
> {
> return outputShutdown;
> }
> +
> + /**
> + * @since 1.5
> + */
> + public void setPerformancePreferences(int connectionTime, int
> latency, int bandwidth)
> + {
> + // Ignored
> + }
> }
> diff --git a/java/net/SocketImpl.java b/java/net/SocketImpl.java
> index 77f470b..ab3b636 100644
> --- a/java/net/SocketImpl.java
> +++ b/java/net/SocketImpl.java
> @@ -318,4 +318,12 @@ public abstract class SocketImpl implements
> SocketOptions
> {
> throw new IOException("Not implemented in this socket class");
> }
> +
> + /**
> + * @since 1.5
> + */
> + public void setPerformancePreferences(int connectionTime, int
> latency, int bandwidth)
> + {
> + // Ignored
> + }
> }
> --
> 1.7.6.5
>
>
>
I don't see how this is better than just not having these APIs. Shouldn't
they at least delegate to VM level?
--
Andrew :)
Free Java Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)
PGP Key: 248BDC07 (https://keys.indymedia.org/)
Fingerprint = EC5A 1F5E C0AD 1D15 8F1F 8F91 3B96 A578 248B DC07
