"Aaron M. Renn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Paul was supposed to contact them to see if we could use it rather > than rewriting it, which is why the status of that package is kind > of a mess right now. Paul? Stuart Ballard suggested that we not use SableUtil. There's no need to rewrite it, since we already have as much functionality as they do. Collections should be finished RSN, or at least that was the last I heard from Stuart. -- Paul Fisher * [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Few clueless questions: vm for classpath Artur Biesiadowski
- Re: Few clueless questions: vm for classpath Aaron M. Renn
- java.util was Re: Few clueless questions: vm f... Paul Fisher
- java.util was Re: Few clueless questions: ... Stuart Ballard
- RE: Few clueless questions: vm for classpath John Keiser
