Is it not possible to have makefiles for both javac and guavac? Aaron,
what in your code won't work with javac?
>From the brief notes on the guavac page it looks like Cygnus might be
working toward a gcc-based java compiler. Does anyone have any more
details on this?
On second thought: Should classpath be providing a written-in-java javac
implementation as well (OK, not right now, but at some point down the
line)? That would make sense if the Japhar/Classpath master plan is to
fully replace dependencies on Javasoft products. (IMO guavac is good, but
it does suffer from platform constraints more than a pure-java
implementation like javac does.)
Since guavac is already C++, would there be any benefit in trying to
convert it to java?
Open to your flames...
Wes
Brian Jones wrote:
> Am I correct in saying we can 'require' guavac for the build process?
> I mean Aaron's code depends on it and it allows us to avoid relying on
> proprietary code for the build.
>
> Brian
> --
> |-------------------------------|Software Engineer
> |Brian Jones |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> |[EMAIL PROTECTED] |http://www.nortel.net
> |http://www.classpath.org/ |------------------------------
