Paul Fisher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "John Keiser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Let's just use that as an indication that protected classes are
> > allowed.
>
> Everyone seems to be missing my point.
>
> Top-level non-public classes should not be implemented. Period. The
> only valid modifiers for a top-level class are "public", "abstract",
> and "final" ("static" denotes all top-level classes in Java 1.1). If
> a top-level class does not have the public modifier, then we will not
> be implementing it.
>
> A good example of a top-level non-public class which we will not be
> implementing is HashtableEnumerator (which is included with the JDK).
>
> Protected fields/methods/inner classes will be implemented. They are
> documented and considered part of the public Java API.
Okay everyone, I've made the changes necessary to have this work.
I've also discovered a small regex bug which I promptly squashed. I
have a couple of computers working on regenerating those results as I
type.
Brian
--
|-------------------------------|Software Engineer
|Brian Jones |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |http://www.nortel.net
|http://www.classpath.org/ |------------------------------
